..
.
Jerusalem, Jan.2, 2009
Who Sows the Wind ...
A lot of people are (falsely) comparing the present behavior of Israel with Gaza’s arabs to that of nazis with jews.
As a jew, I have often heard a question which may be in the heart of these arabs today: “Where was G.d during the shoah ?”
The first answer that arises is that the right question might be “where was man during the shoah ?” And not only during but before. And not only the perpetrators but the instigators. And not only the instigators but those that had set a system able to give power to the will of satanic people that have broken out from ourselves ?
But, before blaming outside causes, jews are well aware of who they were at the time. They were successful American and germans, teachers, bankers, scientists, gangsters, lawyers, they were french styled proud advisers of the north african and arabian rulers, they were the dry remnants of a dying “jewish tradition”, they had nothing to do with the Hebrew people for more than two millenaries. Coming to Israel and recreate one people on one land was a long forgotten dream, G.d was invisible and the world was a full steam dream factory, or so it seemed.
In reality, the fate of jews at the time was no different than that of others. They even were at the edge of the modernity and they promoted the industrialization of the world even more than everyone else. But like for other peoples, they had their traitors who teamed up with non jews of their kind. Those alliances had the sinister goal to profit of the masses’ dreams of progress and modernity in order to enslave them by the back. The Rotschilds and Rockfellers really took off after the great depression of 1873. They had previously designed the financial and doctrinal bases (jesuits, freemasons, chivalry orders, “jewish” banks …) of their dominations and it would not be so difficult for them to shape the world with the power of money, industry and evil. All the wars since the one of 1870, which was the last ‘independent’ real war between states, have been engineered by these occult groups of rich and powerful Nimrods of today whose might no government, no people can escape.
They have made of the world a dangerous place that cannot be called home anymore and where from our children run away.
Jews who, before the second world war had remained consciously “jewish”, not only didn't ask themselves if they had a part in the haskala and neither did they see in the opening of Israel after 2000 years as a possibility to go back there because it was the (designed) project of non religious jews. Had they want to go, anyhow, they wouldn't have been let to by the rulers of the Middle East at the time, British and secular zionist jews together, as it happened (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9024068972366598651&ei=Kj1dSdKRCpeg2wLho8xC&q=herzl+and+zionism&hl=en - Zionism and Herzl: The Antisemitic Side of Zionism). But it shows, as it is today, that orthodox jews do not see seculars as their brothers and instead prefer to remain in exile in the middle of pagan countries like the Lubavitch.
Between the two wars, my grandparents came to Paris, from near Sofia, Bulgaria and from Warsaw, Poland. They were jews by name, by antique memories and by the name of Jerusalem hidden somewhere in their minds. As a matter of fact, they were to be cruelly remembered of this unconscious part of them by Nazism. They were not much different from other bulgarian countrymen or polish citizens that were regrouping by their places of birth and their family traditions like chinese do in China or africans in Africa.
They were no more jewish and they belonged to the majority of jews at this time, the ‘haskala’ secular jews of the 19th century. Jews were divided and did not see the wind coming because they did not see themselves as actual jews, but were living in a dreamland, be it secular or religious. The religious have a part of responsability in chasing jews from their roots with their mythical religion, but on another hand, they keep 'tradition' running, but at what price ? Division, of the people, spiritually and physically.
Halacha has codified a jewish religion into a behavior guide from the toilet to the shul and has put G.d behind bars (and not that bright to say the least). Kabballa added a mythical head to the tighten body of laws. Not G.d has to be loved but their law that
"Halacha + Kaballa = Haskala + Shoah"*, but the forces that drove the shoah do not come from this equation but from evil hands.
It isn’t a surprise that the ‘conservative’ religious movement that emerged from this created “jewish” religion, after having hold on to his group as the religious leaders from the romans to the 18th century, lost most of its people at the beginning of the 'modern world', as did many of the other religions at the time.
People did not desire to bring their churches to the buzzing fast growing cities, and anyhow, most of them were attached to their religion as much as to the beautiful fruits they were leaving behind themselves on the trees of their ancestors gardens, trees they were never to see again, neither their children, nor us.
G.d is where are human beings. Do not huge herds of antelopes live in the middle of lions and hyenas ?
We humans have not only lions and hyenas but dragons, mythological evil rulers who have kept us enslaved by our own myths as much as through the virtual materialistic amoral cultures they have made prosperous worldwide.
Inside human groups, some are welcoming this path of a world turned towards greed and pride for an elite minority. If we take the arabs, they are divided as a people, roughly, between shiites and sunnites. This difference is not only, nowadays, a religious one but a moral one. Sunnites are allied of the west principally because of oil but also because they welcome alliances with foreign leaders, whoever they are, as long as they serve their interests. Shiites are against the corruption and the world control plans that are accepted and shared by Sunnites leaders of Fatah, Kuwait, Saudi-Arabia, Egypt, Turkey (as a muslim country), Jordan … (but both religions breed violent tyrannies)
Until Abraham’s One G.d concept, there was no real absolute responsibility of man towards himself because gods were not an absolute reality but a relative one. Man has always believed in an outside entity that had been behind the work of the visible universe and himself. The greatness of natural events has always drawn from him respect and fear. But, at the beginning of humanity, there were different gods. There was some morality, though, but only relative to one another and not to a point where certain behaviors had to be of universal value. One could kill his brother because, having another belief, he became his enemy. How much wrong is the world !
Right after having created the sky and the earth with words of wisdom*² (http://geraldschroeder.com/existence.html) so that although different, the sky and earth are made of the same components and thus are able to interact, G.d created “light that was good”. The purpose of “light that was good” is double. First, “light that was good” gives to the creation a direction, a meaning, a substance and above this, it cut the grass under the foot of anyone (Lucy-fer & co) coming and saying that he brings the light, or what is good. G.d already gave to the creation an aim and a value, a goal and a means, by Himself, and He is the only One to thanks. Light, the one and only, had been created by G.d and it actually is good. No other light than G.D’s is, and is good. What is not G.d’s own light is not and is not good, no good can come at all except from G.d’s light. Man is put in front of this evidence: "choose life, choose good", because all what is outside is neither life nor good. Deuteronomy 30/19-20: “I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day, that I have set before thee life and death, the blessing and the curse; therefore choose life, that thou mayest live, thou and thy seed; to love the LORD thy God, to hearken to His voice, and to cleave unto Him; for that is thy life, and the length of thy days;”
At its very beginning, the Torah annihilates any future intent of usurpation of the origin of goodness and of the meaning of life. Is it a chance ?
Now we find that the “Spirit of G.d”, the “Mind-Stuff” of the Universe, the Good Hand behind all that is, is at the tip of our fingers, shouldn’t we try to reach Him, and pray with all our humility together with all our energy that He helps us a little to get rid of the tyrants of the ages who rule us with an iron fist ?
..................................................................................................
*I said : « Halacha + Kaballa = Haskala + Shoah ».
Let it be understood that I have nothing against keeping and researching laws neither against elaborating spiritual and behavioral conceptions based on wisdom and love of G.d and one another.
I only say that one cannot reach anything in an environment that eradicates with coercive power any intend to practice and share the principles studied and taught by the scholars of G.d. (hmm, good ones at least like: http://www.laitman.com/)
I also don’t say that they are wrong to do what they do, neither, globally, that they are wrong with the results of their work.
I just point to the basic fact that the most beautiful flower doesn’t feed an empty stomach, that the greatest wisdom doesn’t bring down the walls of a jail.
Even more, asking people to give one another flowers and believe in love to be saved in the middle of a spiritual and material war equals to board them on the trains to Auschwitz more surely than anything else.
We jews are not alone on earth and a lot of issues are fundamental for our survival as a people, in the same way as anybody else, and much before flower sharing and spiritual achievement.
First of all, we are human beings and the result of a long process that has given a human society in which, sadly, the power of egoism through pride and greed drives everything until death.
We have to realize that we live in occupied lands, that the societies where we grew are perverted by design since immemorial times by the same kind of suckers, no matter the color of the flag or the writing of the law.
The world could easily be a much better place would there be none of these satanic handful of people that manage to rule over flocks of sheeps worldwide.
It should be understood that, though the peoples are not complicit, they are not without guilt either, the biggest being to willfully remain ignorant of the facts, past and present, that point to the true picture, mostly because of egoism on their own part, habit and love of illusion. The first step in advancing ourselves toward a better future has to be the understanding that we have to stop collectively blessing our oppressors, we must quit our armchairs, rise on our feet and stop collaborating with evil from far or near.
Neither Halacha nor Kaballah say this but teach to obey the ruler whoever he is.
..................................................................................................
*²Gerald Schroeder:
"The opening word, usually translated as "In the beginning," is the Hebrew Be'reasheet. Be'reasheet can mean "In the beginning of" but not "In the beginning." The difficulty with the preposition "of" is that its object is absent from the sentence and so the usual English translation merely drops it.
Rather than changing the meaning of the Hebrew and ignoring the "of," the 2,100 year old Jerusalem translation of Genesis into Aramaic realizes that Be'reacheet is a compound word: the prefix Be' – with; and raesheet – a first wisdom.
The meaning becomes: "With wisdom God created the heavens and the earth." That wisdom is the first part of creation finds its parallel repeatedly in the Bible. For example, "With the word of God the heavens were formed" (Ps. 33:6). And, "How manifold are Your works, Eternal, You made them all with wisdom" (Ps 104:24). And, "Raesheet hohmah - Beginning of wisdom," (Ps. 111:10).
A single consciousness, a universal wisdom, pervades the universe. And more than that. The discoveries of science, those that search the quantum nature of subatomic matter, have moved us to the brink of a startling realization: all existence is the expression of this wisdom. In the laboratories we experience it as information that first physically articulated as energy and then condensed into the form of matter.
Every particle, every being, from atom to human, appears to represent a level of information, of wisdom.
Wisdom is the fundamental building block of the universe, and as such it is an inherent characteristic. In the processes of life that wisdom finds its most complex revelation. Wisdom, information, an idea, is the link between the metaphysical creating Force and the physical creation. It is the hidden face of God."
more at: http://geraldschroeder.com/new.html
~~~
"The Spirit of G.d"
Genesis 1, 41
2 Now the earth was unformed and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep; and the spirit of God hovered over the face of the waters.
38 And Pharaoh said unto his servants: 'Can we find such a one (Joseph) as this, a man in whom the spirit of God is ?'
Exodus 31, 35
3 and I have filled him (Bezalel) with the spirit of God, in wisdom, and in understanding, and in knowledge, and in all manner of workmanship ...
31 And He hath filled him with the spirit of God, in wisdom, in understanding, and in knowledge, and in all manner of workmanship.
Numbers 24
2 And Balaam lifted up his eyes, and he saw Israel dwelling tribe by tribe; and the spirit of God came upon him
Judges 6, 13
34 But the spirit of the LORD clothed Gideon; and he blew a horn; and Abiezer was gathered together after him.
24 … Samson; and the child grew, and the LORD blessed him.
25 And the spirit of the LORD began to move him in Mahaneh-dan, between Zorah and Eshtaol.1 Samuel 11, 19
6 And the spirit of God came mightily upon Saul when he heard those words, and his anger was kindled greatly. 7 And he took a yoke of oxen, and cut them in pieces, and sent them throughout all the borders of Israel by the hand of messengers, saying: 'Whosoever cometh not forth after Saul and after Samuel, so shall it be done unto his oxen.' And the dread of the LORD fell on the people, and they came out as one man.
18 Now David fled, and escaped, and came to Samuel to Ramah, and told him all that Saul had done to him. And he and Samuel went and dwelt in Naioth. 19 And it was told Saul, saying: 'Behold, David is at Naioth in Ramah.' 20 And Saul sent messengers to take David; and when they saw the company of the prophets prophesying, and Samuel standing as head over them, the spirit of God came upon the messengers of Saul, and they also prophesied. 21 And when it was told Saul, he sent other messengers, and they also prophesied. And Saul sent messengers again the third time, and they also prophesied. 22 Then went he also to Ramah, and came to the great cistern that is in Secu; and he asked and said: 'Where are Samuel and David?' And one said: 'Behold, they are at Naioth in Ramah.' 23 And he went thither to Naioth in Ramah; and the spirit of God came upon him also, and he went on, and prophesied, until he came to Naioth in Ramah. 24 And he also stripped off his clothes, and he also prophesied before Samuel, and lay down naked all that day and all that night. Wherefore they say: 'Is Saul also among the prophets ?'
Isaiah 40, 61
13 Who hath meted out the spirit of the LORD ? Or who was His counselor that he might instruct Him ?
1 The spirit of the Lord GOD is upon me; because the LORD hath anointed me to bring good tidings unto the humble; He hath sent me to bind up the broken-hearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the eyes to them that are bound;
Ezekiel 11/24
"And a spirit lifted me up, and brought me in the vision by the spirit of God into Chaldea, to them of the captivity. So the vision that I had seen went up from Me."
Job 27, 33
3 "All the while my breath is in me, and the spirit of God is in my nostrils,"
4 "The spirit of God hath made me, and the breath of the Almighty given me life."
Micah 3/8
"But I truly am full of power by the spirit of the LORD, and of justice, and of might,
to declare unto Jacob his transgression, and to Israel his sin."
~~~
http://www.aip.org/history/heisenberg/p13e.htm
Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science
(New York: Harper and Row, 1958)
Lectures delivered at University of St. Andrews, Scotland, Winter 1955-56.
Excerpt from pp 71-72
"Quantum Theory and the Roots of Atomic Science"
Heisenberg
In the philosophy of Democritus the atoms are eternal and indestructible units of matter, they can never be transformed into each other. With regard to this question modern physics takes a definite stand against the materialism of Democritus and for Plato and the Pythagoreans. The elementary particles are certainly not eternal and indestructible units of matter, they can actually be transformed into each other.
As a matter of fact, if two such particles, moving through space with a very high kinetic energy, collide, then many new elementary particles may be created from the available energy and the old particles may have disappeared in the collision. Such events have been frequently observed and offer the best proof that all particles are made of the same substance: energy. But the resemblance of the modern views to those of Plato and the Pythagoreans can be carried somewhat further. The elementary particles in Plato's Timaeus are finally not substance but mathematical forms.
"All things are numbers" is a sentence attributed to Pythagoras. The only mathematical forms available at that time were such geometric forms as the regular solids or the triangles which form their surface. In modern quantum theory there can be no doubt that the elementary particles will finally also be mathematical forms but of a much more complicated nature.
The Greek philosophers thought of static forms and found them in the regular solids. Modern science, however, has from its beginning in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries started from the dynamic problem. The constant element in physics since Newton is not a configuration or a geometrical form, but a dynamic law. The equation of motion holds at all times, it is in this sense eternal, whereas the geometrical forms, like the orbits, are changing.
Therefore, the mathematical forms that represent the elementary particles will be solutions of some eternal law of motion for matter. This is a problem which has not yet been solved.
~~~
Excerpts of
Wholeness and the Implicate Order
David Bohm
http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Physics-David-Bohm-Holographic-Universe.htm
At present quantum physicists tend to avoid the issue by adopting the attitude that our overall views concerning the nature of reality are of little or no importance. All that counts in physical theory is supposed to be the development of mathematical equations that permit us to predict and control the behaviour of large statistical aggregates of particles. Such a goal is not regarded as merely for its pragmatic and technical utility: rather, it has become a presupposition of most work in modern physics that prediction and control of this kind is all that human knowledge is about.
I would say that my scientific and philosophical work, my main concern has been with understanding the nature of reality in general and consciousness in particular as a coherent whole, which is never static or complete, but which is in an unending process of movement and unfoldment. Thus, when I look back, I see that even as a child I was fascinated by the puzzle, indeed the mystery, of what is the nature of movement. Whenever one thinks of anything, it seems to be apprehended either as static or as a series of static images. Yet, in the actual experience of movement, one senses an unbroken, undivided process of flow, to which the series of static images in thought is related as a series of 'still' photographs might be related to the actuality of a speeding car.
Then there is the further question of what is the relationship of thinking to reality. As careful attention shows, thought itself is in an actual process of movement. That is to say, one can feel a sense of flow in the 'stream of consciousness' not dissimilar to the sense of flow in the movement of matter in general. May not thought itself thus be part of reality as a whole? But then, what could it mean for one part of reality to know another, and to what extent would this be possible? Does the content of thought merely give us abstract and simplified 'snapshots' of reality, or can it go further, somehow to grasp the very essence of the living movement that we sense in actual experience?
Man's general way of thinking of the totality, i.e. his general world view, is crucial for overall order of the human mind itself. If he thinks of the totality as constituted as independent fragments, then that is how his mind will tend to operate, but if he can include everything coherently and harmoniously in an overall whole that is undivided, unbroken and without border (for every border is a division or break) then his mind will tend to move in a similar way, and from this will flow an orderly action within the whole.
Indeed, man has always been seeking wholeness - mental, physical, social and individual. .. It is instructive to consider the word 'health' in English is based on an Anglo-Saxon word 'hale' meaning 'whole': that is, to be healthy is to be whole. Likewise the English 'holy' is based on the same root as 'whole'. All of this indicates that man has sensed always that wholeness or integrity is an absolute necessity to make life worth living. Yet, over the ages, he has generally lived in fragmentation.
If we supposed that theories gave true knowledge, corresponding to 'reality as it is', then we would have to conclude that Newtonian Mechanics was true until around 1900, after which it suddenly became false, while relativity and quantum theory suddenly became the truth. Such an absurd conclusion does not arise, however, if we say that all theories are insights, which are neither true nor false.... Man is continually developing new forms of insight, which are clear up to a point and then tend to become unclear. In this activity, there is evidently no reason to suppose that there is or will be a final form of insight (corresponding to absolute truth) or even a steady series of approximations to this. Rather, one may expect the unending development of new forms of insight (which will, however assimilate certain key features of the older forms as simplifications, in the way that relativity theory does with Newtonian theory). Our theories are to be regarded primarily as ways of looking at the world as a whole ('world-views') rather than as 'absolute true knowledge of how things are'.
What prevents theoretical insights from going beyond existing limitations and changing to meet new facts is just the belief that theories give true knowledge of reality (which implies, of course, that they never change). Although our modern way of thinking has changed a great deal relative to the ancient one, the two have had one key feature in common: i.e. they are both generally 'blinkered' by the notion that theories give true knowledge about 'reality as it is'. Thus, both are led to confuse the forms and shapes induced in our perceptions by theoretical insight with a reality independent of our thought and way of looking. This confusion is of crucial significance, since it leads us to approach nature, society and the individual in terms of more or less fixed and limited forms of thought, and thus, apparently, to keep on confirming the limitations of these forms of thought in experience.
If man thinks of the totality as constituted of independent fragments, then that is how his mind will tend to operate, but if he can include everything coherently and harmoniously in an overall whole that is undivided, unbroken, and without a border then his mind will tend to move in a similar way, and from this will flow an orderly action within the whole.
The notion that all these fragments are separately existent is evidently an illusion, and this illusion cannot do other than lead to endless conflict and confusion. Indeed, the attempt to live according to the notion that the fragments are really separate is, in essence, what has led to the growing series of extremely urgent crises that is confronting us today. Thus, as is now well known, this way of life has brought about pollution, destruction of the balance of nature, over-population, world-wide economic and political disorder and the creation of an overall environment that is neither physically nor mentally healthy for most of the people who live in it. Individually there has developed a widespread feeling of helplessness and despair, in the face of what seems to be an overwhelming mass of disparate social forces, going beyond the control and even the comprehension of the human beings who are caught up in it.
No comments:
Post a Comment